The Conservative Party’s position on the NHS often centres on blaming declining productivity while pointing to record levels of funding as evidence that the system itself is inefficient. This has become a common political narrative, but it fails to reflect the complex and multi-layered challenges the NHS faces today. A more balanced view would consider the historical funding context, structural inefficiencies, workforce issues, rising demand, and the impact of underinvestment in public health.
The claim that NHS funding is at record levels is not incorrect in nominal terms, but this framing can be misleading. When adjusted for inflation and rising healthcare demand, the picture looks less favourable. Health experts and independent organisations have frequently noted that while government spending on the NHS has increased in recent years, the rate of increase has often fallen below historical averages. Traditionally, NHS funding rose by around 4% per year in real terms, but since 2010, this has slowed, averaging closer to 1.5-2% annually. Against the backdrop of growing demand, technological costs, and an ageing population, this slower growth has contributed to many of the system’s current pressures. Furthermore, when these funding increases are set against persistent backlogs, rising waiting times, and growing staff shortages, it becomes evident that the NHS is struggling to meet demand, even with more money being spent.
Productivity, another area often criticised, is difficult to measure in healthcare. Unlike other sectors, where outputs are easier to quantify, the outcomes of healthcare—improved health and wellbeing—are far more complex. While there was a trend of improving productivity before the pandemic, COVID-19 caused a major disruption. The reallocation of resources to pandemic response, infection control measures that slowed down routine care, and high levels of staff absence all contributed to reduced productivity in recent years. Beyond the pandemic, persistent staffing shortages remain a major constraint. The NHS has been operating with tens of thousands of vacancies, leading to overstretched staff, rising burnout, and higher turnover, all of which affect the system’s ability to operate efficiently. Moreover, the crisis in social care, where underfunded services struggle to meet demand, creates a knock-on effect for hospitals, as patients face delays in discharge, further clogging up acute care settings.
Rising demand is another major factor behind the NHS’s difficulties. The population is not only growing but also ageing, with a corresponding rise in chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and obesity-related illnesses. The NHS now cares for more people with multiple and complex conditions than ever before, straining services from general practice to hospital care. This demand has also been exacerbated by the long tail of the pandemic, which has left behind a backlog of patients who delayed seeking care during COVID-19 peaks.
The structure of the NHS also presents challenges. Years of reform have introduced layers of complexity and fragmentation, particularly between health and social care services. While Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) have been introduced to encourage collaboration and reduce fragmentation, significant barriers remain. Disjointed services and poor coordination continue to affect the delivery of smooth, efficient patient care. Additionally, administrative inefficiencies and outdated IT systems hamper progress. Attempts to modernise—such as the shift to fully digital records—have often been delayed or unevenly implemented, limiting the potential for technology to ease some of the burden on staff and services.
At the heart of the NHS’s difficulties is a workforce crisis. Real-terms pay cuts and worsening working conditions have contributed to widespread industrial action across multiple staff groups, including nurses and junior doctors. Low morale and burnout are now common among healthcare workers, driving some to leave the profession altogether. Regardless of funding levels, no health system can function effectively without a supported and adequately staffed workforce.
Another factor that is frequently overlooked in political debates is the role of public health and prevention. Austerity measures over the past decade have seen significant cuts to public health budgets, particularly at the local authority level. These cuts have reduced the capacity to tackle the root causes of poor health, such as smoking, obesity, and physical inactivity. As a result, more people present later to health services with preventable conditions, placing additional strain on the NHS. Long-term underinvestment in prevention and early intervention undermines the system’s sustainability and deepens health inequalities.
In reality, the difficulties facing the NHS cannot be explained solely by references to funding levels or productivity figures. The system is under strain from a complex mix of underfunding in real terms, rising demand, systemic inefficiencies, and a struggling workforce. Without addressing these deeper issues—including prevention, workforce morale, and social care reform—attempts to improve NHS performance will remain limited. The current political narrative offers only a partial explanation and risks obscuring the urgent need for comprehensive, long-term solutions.
Matthew 
Leave a comment